Meridian Star


December 29, 2013

Rulings on same-sex couples have tax consequences

MERIDIAN — The Supreme Court ruling invalidating DOMA, the Defense of Marriage Act, will likely have sociological implications for years to come. But what’s the immediate tax impact? Under new IRS guidance, a same-sex couple will be treated like a traditional married couple for federal income tax purposes if they were married in a state that permits such marriages, regardless of where they reside. Here’s a summary of several key issues.

    Filing status. Under the new ruling, legally married same-sex couples must file joint federal income tax returns for 2013, unless they opt to file separately as married individuals. Thus, same-sex couples now face the same tax dilemmas as other married couples.

    Marriage penalty. Same-sex couples filing jointly may effectively pay a “marriage penalty” in situations where the income of each spouse is similar. For instance, instead of each spouse paying a top tax rate of, say, 28%, their combined top tax rate could reach 33%. Conversely, if their incomes are disparate, the couple might benefit from a “marriage bonus.”

    Deduction and credit limits. Again, the tax rules could work for or against a same-sex couple. For instance, tax breaks for higher education expenses are phased out above certain adjusted gross income (AGI) levels, thereby increasing or decreasing deductions or credits that were being claimed separately. Another example: Due to certain deduction “floors” based on AGI, the overall outcome may differ by using a combined AGI.

    Amended returns. The IRS says that a same-sex couple may file an amended tax return for an open tax year – generally, 2010, 2011 or 2012 – but they aren’t legally obligated to amend returns for prior years. Thus, refund opportunities may be available.

    There’s more to come. The IRS promises additional guidance in the near future.


    David Compton is a Certified Public Accountant with offices in Meridian and Birmingham, Ala.

Text Only
Biz Marquee
New Today

A majority of House members approved a motion to sue President Obama for exceeding his constitutional boundaries. The lawsuit will focus on the presidents overhaul of health care. Do you think the lawsuit is warranted?

     View Results
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter
AP Video
Renewed Violence Taking Toll on Gaza Residents 2 Americans Detained in North Korea Seek Help US Employers Add 209K Jobs, Rate 6.2 Pct House GOP Optimistic About New Border Bill Gaza Truce Unravels; Israel, Hamas Trade Blame Raw: Tunisia Closes Borders With Libya Four Rescued From Crashed Plane Couple Channel Grief Into Soldiers' Retreat WWI Aviation Still Alive at Aerodrome in NY Raw: Rescuers at Taiwan Explosion Scene Raw: Woman Who Faced Death Over Faith in N.H. Clinton Before 9-11: Could Have Killed Bin Laden Netanyahu Vows to Destroy Hamas Tunnels Obama Slams Republicans Over Lawsuit House Leaders Trade Blame for Inaction
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide